![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
Seller FinancingThe
partial views of the LDM input page below illustrate the effect of
seller financing on profitability. In scenario#1 the
seller has agreed
to finance $500,000 (lines 40 & 41) at an interest rate of 5
percent for a term of three years (lines 43 & 44), while the
seller
does not provide owner financing in scenario #2 (line 40).
In the case of the second scenario the developer has to come up with the $500,000 in cash because the the costs of phase one land and development are unaffected by the presence or non-presence of seller financing (the lender will loan only a certain percentage of the phase one land and development costs). It is easy to see that seller willingness to help finance a project in the form of a subordinated mortgage can make or break a developer's ability to take on a project. It
is important to point out that the effect seller financing has on
profitability shows up below the gross profit level of analysis. Note
below that gross profit under both scenarios is $1,746,600. (Scenario #1 , Scenario #2) This model allows for below gross profit analysis on seller financing and other development components such as construction duration, absorption, phasing decisions, land option alternatives, interest rate and interest rate trend, and lender loan requirements. Seller
Financing - Scenario #1
Seller
Financing - Scenario #2
Land Development Model, LLC 302 West Lafayette Road Medina, OH 44256 330.441.1690 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||